• Text Size
  • Contrast
  • |    Contact Us    |
  • Login  
  • About Us
  • Events & Training
  • Advocacy
About Us Accessibility Annual Report Awards
By-Law Board of Directors Contact Us Careers
History Membership Municipal 101 Memorandum of Understanding
Products & Services Volunteering Watch File
Events
Event Registration

MIDAS
Dashboard
Contact Us
Checkout

emergency services
Result of 1-5 of 30
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • >>
    reset search      

    OPP Begins Municipal Consultations on Billing Reform
    An Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) driven consultation has begun via seven regional forums with 74 randomly selected OPP contracted and OPP non-contracted municipalities.
    09/05/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    The forums in Northwestern Ontario have been completed with sessions in Northeastern, Central, Eastern and Southwestern Ontario to occur shortly.  At the completion of these regional sessions later in May, a report of what the OPP heard will be consolidated and then sent out to all 323 OPP-serviced municipalities for further comment and validation.

    The OPP consultation is about the reform of the method it uses to bill municipalities for its policing services.  The OPP is seeking direct feedback on municipal views of the current billing method and to find out what is important to municipal governments in the development of future billing options.  This municipal consultation will help to inform changes to the OPP billing method that will be presented to the provincial government for decision.  Anticipated timing is that any change would be made this fall.  There is a broad understanding that the current OPP billing system, which has developed over time, is not equitable among municipal governments. 

    This billing reform initiative is specifically scoped on how to bill municipalities for OPP services going forward.  It is not designed to explore or address the underlying OPP service cost drivers.  However, there is recognition of the complex linkages between this billing initiative to the continuing municipal call for reduction of overall policing costs, the Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) and the work of the Future of Policing Advisory Committee (FPAC) that is looking at core and non-core functions and ways to impact costs.

    There is a wide variation and lack of transparency of OPP costs to the municipalities they serve.  OPP costs can vary widely between municipalities within the same detachment or among municipalities with similar populations.  Also, municipalities that are considered "hub" communities (e.g. serve as regional centres), experience higher policing costs than same-sized non-hub municipalities. This has been of great concern to those municipalities paying higher than average per household costs for their OPP services.  The 2011 per household costs for OPP services can range from under a $100 to well over $600.

    Bringing greater transparency and clear communication of what is in OPP billing to municipalities, was in part addressed through the 2012 publication Understanding Municipal Policing Cost  developed by an AMO, OPP and Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services working group.  Although it provided a detailed inventory as to all the cost variables that go into municipal OPP billing, it was not able to address the OPP deployment model, the calls for service/response standards or other factors that determine the municipal policing costs. 

    In April, the OPP Municipal Policing Bureau established a Municipal Policing Working Group with municipal representatives.  It has the following objectives: 
    • To provide a forum for the OPP to discuss and provide strategic advice on opportunities to enhance efficiency and effectiveness of OPP municipal police services.
    • To provide an opportunity for stakeholders early input into its policy development process and ensure that proposed policy initiatives are relevant, timely and, ultimately, successful.
    • To solicit diverse perspectives on municipal policing and new ideas to strengthen the efficiency and effectiveness of municipal police services.
    The Working Group is also composed of: OPP representatives, municipal representatives (Mayors and CAOs from contract and non-contract OPP-policed municipalities), AMO, Ontario Association of Police Services Board (OAPSB) staff and provincial government staff.  Although the current focus of the OPP working group is on this billing initiative, other expected future issues to be discussed are civilian governance, future legislation and opportunities for more efficient and effective OPP municipal police services.

    This week, OPP Municipal Policing Bureau Commander, Superintendent Rick Philbin, sent a letter to all 323 OPP-serviced municipalities with respect to the 2014 projected salary increase of 8.55%.  The letter is attached.  The salary increase is part of the collective agreement, started in January 2011 and to end in December 2014.  The terms of the agreement called for an increase of 5% in 2011, followed by a two year wage freeze and top up commitment for 2014.  It should be understood that the only possible way to undo such collective agreement increases would be by provincial legislation which would draw legal and policy challenges. 

    Additionally, on May 6th, OPP Commissioner Chris Lewis released a video statement on the complex issues surrounding the costs of municipal policing. 

    AMO will continue to update members on progress and any additional emerging issues related to municipal policing costs.

    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Monika Turner
    Director of Policy
    mturner@amo.on.ca
    T 416.971.9856 ext. 318
    TF 1.877.426.6527
    F 416.971.6191

    Links

    OPP Municipal Policing Bureau Commander, Superintendent Rick Philbint Letter
    OPP Commissioner Chris Lewis video statement
    Understanding Municipal Policing Cost

    Mandatory Sprinklers in Vulnerable Occupancies
    The Ontario Government announces mandatory sprinklers in vulnerable occupancies.
    09/05/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    At the Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs (OAFC) Conference earlier this week, Premier Wynne stated that the government will make automatic sprinklers mandatory in all retirement and nursing homes and residences for the disabled in Ontario. Today, Minister of Community, Safety and Correctional Services, the Honourable Madeleine Meilleur and Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Honourable Linda Jeffery, provided further details on the amendments to the Fire Code and Building Code in an announcement.
      
    Under the new proposed regulations, operators of homes will have five years to comply from when the legislation takes force on January 1, 2014. The expected changes will also require Ontario municipalities to maintain a registry of the "vulnerable occupancies" in their jurisdictions and require local fire departments to conduct annual inspections.

    In April 2012, the Office of the Fire Marshal formed the Technical Advisory Committee on Vulnerable Occupancies (TAC) to undertake a technical review to examine long-term fire safety provisions for residences housing vulnerable Ontarians.  A report was then released in January 2013 listing recommendations for fire safety provisions for residences housing vulnerable Ontarians. 

    The Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services and the Office of the Fire Marshal, have committed to working with AMO and municipal representatives and through working groups, to inform the implementation of this initiative as it will affect municipal governments’ responsibilities. 

    AMO will continue to discuss the municipal impacts of the required implementation with the provincial government and we will keep members updated.
    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Sumeeta Kapur
    Policy Advisor
    skapur@amo.on.ca
    T 416.971.9856 ext. 353
    TF 1.877.426.6527
    F 416.971.6191

    Links

    Minister of Community, Safety and Correctional Services Announcement
    Report On Improving Fire Safety For Vulnerable Ontarians
    Policing Update January 2013
    Last week Public Safety Canada held a Summit on the Economics of Policing which included nearly 300 representatives from across the country.
    22/01/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    AMO was represented at the Summit by Past President Gary McNamara, Mayor of the Town of Tecumseh.

    Federal Minister Vic Toews spoke of two options to address the rising cost of policing - do nothing and become forced to cut drastically or be proactive in the pursuit of meaningful ways to achieve sustainable policing costs.  AMO continues to advocate for the latter.

    The Federation of Canadian Municipalities estimates costs for police services in Canada went up from $6.4 billion in 1999 to $12.3 billion in 2009, with municipalities paying for 60 per cent of that increase.  Here in Ontario, municipalities alone spent more than $3.5 billion on policing in 2010.  This is being tackled in part by the Future of Policing Advisory Committee and its working groups in which municipalities, through AMO, are well represented.

    AMO continues to raise issues related to the cost of policing in a variety of areas. The accountability and transparency of arbitrators remains AMO’s top priority.

    AMO President Russ Powers and Past President Gary McNamara recently met with the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services, the Honourable Madame Meilleur, and OPP Commissioner Lewis to highlight the mutual need for progress and our pledge to provide municipal input as necessary to deliver further efficiencies. AMO remains committed to working with the government on these issues.

    Rising emergency service costs continues to capture media attention. Two recent stories of interest:

    The website of TV Ontario’s The Agenda with Steve Paikin features an interview with Professor Christian Leuprecht of Royal Military College and Queen’s University on the rising cost of emergency services. Posted December 2012, the interview provides a good overall picture of key issues affecting municipalities and emergency service costs.

    The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation last week ran a special series of stories dedicated to the cost of policing.  Among them, University of Ottawa Criminologist Michael Kempa published a story on police costs. 

    AMO will continue to update municipalities on these issues.

    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Matthew Wilson
    Senior Advisor
    mwilson@amo.on.ca
    T 416.971.9856 ext. 323
    TF 1.877.426.6527
    F 416.971.6191

    Links

    Michael Kempa story on police costs
    TV Ontario’s The Agenda with Steve Paikin
    Provincial Auditor’s 2012 Report
    Key municipal interest in OPP recommendations.
    14/12/2012
    test
    • New Tab
    Yesterday the Auditor General of Ontario released his Annual Report which contains a number of recommendations based on his value for money audits of various provincial government program/ service areas.  One of the observations is that “good decisions require good information.”  The report contains several areas of interest to municipalities, in particular, the thorough examination of the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP).    
     
    OPP:  

    The OPP provides 322 municipalities with policing services at an annual cost to municipal property taxpayers of $362 million.  The report highlights escalating policing costs at the same time that crime rates have generally not grown.  Also, it notes that Ontario has the highest per capita policing costs (OPP and municipal own forces) in the country at $294 compared to the national average of $268 (2008 data).  The thrust of the recommendations is for the OPP to find greater efficiencies in its operations, and in fact the report reiterates recommendations from previous audits of the OPP in 2005 that have not been acted on or completed including those related to staff deployment and controlling costs.

    AMO is requesting an urgent meeting with the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services and the Commissioner of the OPP to discuss how recommendations will be prioritized and acted upon in a timely manner.  AMO has been representing municipalities at the Future of Policing Advisory Committee (FPAC) and its working groups.  While FPAC is a useful venue to discuss many issues of relevance to all police forces in Ontario, including policing standards, AMO is seeking a specific opportunity to discuss issues raised in the Auditor General’s report.   In an era of the Drummond Report, provincial deficits, and a stretched property tax dollar – finding greater efficiencies in OPP operations is critical for the municipalities that rely on its police services.

    Below are key excerpts from the OPP Chapter in the Report: 
    • Rising cost of service with decreasing crime:  “Over the last five years, the average number of calls for service the OPP has responded to or initiated has remained relatively stable.  By contrast, OPP expenditures net of recoveries from municipalities have increased by 27% over the same period. … Many of the other larger police forces across Canada have had similar expenditure increases, notwithstanding the long-term trend of declining rates of crime and serious motor vehicle accidents.”
    • Need to update staff deployment model:  “It has been more than 10 years since the [staff deployment] model was used to assess the deployment of some 1,550 …officers to detachments that provide other front-line policing.  ...Accordingly, officers face significantly different workloads depending on where they are assigned.  We found that officers in some detachments handled an average of 54% to 137% more calls than officers in other detachments.”
    • Unmeasured response times:  “The OPP also does not analyze either its officers’ availability to immediately response to a call or the time it takes for officers to respond to a call, both key factors in determining the deployment of officers to detachments across Ontario.”
    • Shift scheduling: “Current shift arrangements result in overstaffing during slow early-morning hours compared to the busy afternoon hours.  … We calculate that on Sundays, there was about 20% overstaffing of officers, based on the average number of citizen-generated calls for service.  …Adjusting the current 24-hour fixed schedule… would either result in savings in the range of $5-10 million a year or lead to improved service to the public and officer safety.”
    • Use of civilians:  “The OPP could assign more corporate-services duties and other non-policing work to lower-paid civilian staff to free up officers’ time for policing duties and to save money. The overall savings if community service duties were transferring to civilians would be about $2.6 million a year. … Transferring all court duties to civilians would save another $2.8 million annually.”
    • Overtime:  “Overtime costs have increased by 60% to $53 million for 2011/12.”
    • Cost to municipalities and billing methodology:  “The overall cost of OPP services for municipalities from 2007 to 2011 increased an average of 29% for those with contracts and 19% for those without, or up to three times the annual inflation rate.  …The way the OPP charges municipalities for its services was complex and onerous for both the force and municipalities.  …The cost per officer to municipalities for both direct and other support and operating costs increased from approximately $122,200 in 2007 to $144,000 in 2011, or 18%.”
    • Level of service:  “All municipal officials with whom we spoke said they were very satisfied with the OPP services they received.”

    • Other financial related matters:   

      The report notes that municipalities should expect changes to the Provincial Service Usage (PSU) credits which make up for the time officers in detachments spend performing provincial policing duties or working outside a detachment area.  On average over the past five years, municipalities have received $23 million in such credits.  It is suggested that this be reviewed in concert with the Policing Service Grant component of the Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund.

      The report also includes OPP commentary confirming that it is considering a per capita costing methodology and will presenting such a proposal to the Ministry in late 2012.  If implemented province-wide, such a change would significantly shift the policing cost burden across municipalities. It would also have different implications for contract and non-contract policed communities and the service enhancements for which some municipalities pay a premium to the OPP.  

      A per capita costing methodology is not a substitute for dealing with unsustainable increases in policing costs.   For AMO, we see a need to achieve the greater efficiency identified by the Auditor General, including those matters dating back to 2005, before any consideration is given to a new per capita costing methodology. 
    Long Term Care and Metrolinx:  

    The Auditor General also made recommendations in two other areas of interest to municipal governments.  He highlighted Presto card challenges which affect municipalities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe.   Regarding long term care placement, the Auditor General notes that the median wait time for a bed has tripled since 2005 and he noted the impacts this has on the broader health care system.  System wide impacts have been a concern to municipal governments. 

    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Matthew Wilson
    Senior Advisor
    mwilson@amo.on.ca
    T 416.971.9856 ext 323
    TF 1.877.426.6527
    F 416.971.6191

    Link

    2012 Provincial Auditor’s Report
    PTSD Bill Must Serve Employees and Taxpayers
    Last week, NDP MPP Cheri DiNovo, Parkdale-High Park, introduced Bill 129 An Act to amend the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997, with respect to post traumatic stress disorder.
    12/10/2012
    test
    • New Tab

    Post Traumatic Stress Bill Must Serve Employees and Taxpayers

    Breaking News
    October 12, 2012

    Last week, NDP MPP Cheri DiNovo, Parkdale-High Park, introduced Bill 129, An Act to amend the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997, with respect to post traumatic stress disorder.  Under this draft legislation, the cause of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) among emergency service workers (police, fire, EMS) would be presumed to have occurred in the workplace, unless proven otherwise, and the workers would automatically be entitled to WSIB benefits. 

    As their employers, municipal governments, value our police, fire and EMS workers.  Their health, safety and well-being are a top priority for municipal governments in Ontario. We fully support them receiving prompt medical treatment if they suffer PTSD arising from their work. 

    While the spirit of this draft legislation is understandable, it circumvents WSIB’s evidence-based process. It is reasonable to expect appropriate medical assessment in these cases.  As others have noted, such as the Ontario Association of Police Services Boards, the bill does not promote important steps, such as proper diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation, nor does it support effective back-to-work programs.  Any such legislation must respect the well-being of our emergency service workers, as well as the need for due diligence when spending public funds.

    This is also an opportunity to comment on the challenges of private members’ bills in the context of a minority government situation.  Private members’ bills are problematic for municipal governments on a number of fronts:
    • They are often not drafted well, as they don’t have access to the full government processes and  legal resources needed to develop a  sound piece of legislation; 
    • MPPs who sponsor a private member’s bill do not have to consult with AMO under the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding legislation, which requires municipal input on any potential municipal fiscal impact from a proposed bill or regulation.  As a result, these bills don’t address this important consideration; and
    • Private member bills can emerge suddenly and may be rushed through the Standing Committee process, giving interested parties little chance to analyze or comment on these bills during the legislative process.
    That said, AMO reviews and comments on all bills that may have a financial impact on municipal governments.  Further, AMO asks that all parties in the Legislature consult fully with municipal governments, emergency service associations and emergency service management organizations on Bill 129 before it moves further in the legislative process.
    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    Contact

    Monika Turner
    Director of Policy
    mturner@amo.on.ca
    T  416.971.9856 ext. 318
    TF 1.877.426.6527
    F  416.971.6191

    Links

    Bill 129
    OAPSB
    E-mail this page to a friend

    Advocacy

    Economic Development Energy Finance Housing Infrastructure Labour Planning Risk Management Social Services Waste Management
     

    Events & Training

    Conferences Councillor Training Symposiums Webcasts Workshops

    About Us

    Accessibility AMOmobile app Annual Report Awards Board of Directors By-Law Careers Contact Us History Membership Memorandum of Understanding Municipal 101 Products & Services Volunteering Watch File
    Related Sites
    FONOM Gas Tax at Work LAS MEPCO NOMA OMKN OSUM ROMA
     
    Programs
    Gas Tax MIDAS

    Working to make Ontario municipalities stronger
    © 2013 Association of Municipalities of Ontario   |   website policy


    {1}
    ##LOC[OK]##
    {1}
    ##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##
    {1}
    ##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##