• Text Size
  • Contrast
  • |    Contact Us    |
  • Login  
  • About Us
  • Events & Training
  • Advocacy
About Us Accessibility Annual Report Awards
By-Law Board of Directors Contact Us Careers
History Membership Municipal 101 Memorandum of Understanding
Products & Services Volunteering Watch File
Events
Event Registration

MIDAS
Dashboard
Contact Us
Checkout

finance
Result of 1-5 of 155
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • >>
    reset search      

    2013 Ontario Budget
    2013 Ontario Budget Analysis
    02/05/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    2008 Upload Agreement
    The 2013 Ontario Budget would honour the 2008 Provincial Municipal Fiscal and Service Delivery Review (PMFSDR) agreement to upload provincial social service and court security costs from the municipal property tax base.

    Infrastructure
    The 2013 Ontario Budget’s commitment to infrastructure investment will make Ontario communities safer, more competitive and more prosperous.

    Ontario’s joint 2008 PMFSDR showed that Ontario would need $6 billion in new infrastructure investment every year for 10 years to address our province’s infrastructure deficit.

    As part of its response to this demand, the Ontario Government agreed to upload provincial social service and court security costs from the municipal property tax base over a 10-year period. The Ontario Government has consistently honoured this agreement and the commitment has allowed municipalities to focus on core municipal programs and services, and to better address their infrastructure demands. 

    Ontario municipalities own more infrastructure than any other order of government – federal, provincial or municipal – yet the municipal tax base is limited. Ontario municipalities receive about 9 cents of every tax dollar. This is not sufficient to meet their infrastructure needs. All three orders of government must to work together to meet Ontario’s infrastructure demands.

    The 2013 Budget would:
    • Invest $100 million in 2013-14 for roads and bridges in northern and rural areas.
    • Make the existing provincial two per cent per litre gas tax transfer permanent.
    • Turn select high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area into high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes. HOT lanes are open to carpoolers and to single drivers that can use the lane for a fee.
    • Expand support for transportation and transit infrastructure in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area – details to follow.

    Social Service Costs
    The Budget makes a number of social service related commitments. These changes have the potential to increase costs for municipal governments although we do not have an estimate of the municipal impact yet. Currently, the Ontario Government is taking on increased responsibility for funding its own social service programs, without having to rely on Ontario’s property tax base. This is the primary objective of the 2008 PMFSDR and recent history has shown that Ontario municipalities were wise to ensure that income redistribution programs are funded through the more dynamic income tax base. Property taxes should not be used to fund provincial social service costs. AMO expects to be fully consulted by the Ontario Government as these social service changes are developed.

    Rising Emergency Service Costs 
    Ontario municipalities are deeply concerned about the unchecked rise in emergency service costs. Wages and benefit increases in this area are greater than increases for other municipal employees, the rate of inflation, increases for Ontario’s general population, and the capacity of many municipal governments. For example, the OPP’s collective agreement will amount to a minimum wage increase of at least 8.5 per cent for 2014, and recent decisions by interest arbitrators have awarded fire fighters increases of up to 24 per cent over three years. Ontario municipalities will continue to battered by these increasing costs without legislative changes to Ontario’s interest arbitration system. AMO has made clear and balanced recommendations to address these costs. However, four legislative attempts to address the problem have failed in the past 12 months.

    Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund
    The Budget reaffirms a decrease to the Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) by $25 million in 2014. AMO remains extremely concerned with this decrease. It is occurring at the same time as the Government is consulting separately on the OPP costing formula and key property assessment issues during an OMPF transitional year. The potential for unintended consequences is great. The Budget also contains changes to the social assistance system that will have municipal cost implications starting in 2014.  In 2014, municipalities will remain responsible for funding 14.2 per cent of Ontario Works benefit costs. At the same time, the Government will terminate OMPF reconciliation payments for 2011 and beyond. Municipalities will have to shoulder additional social assistance costs with no corresponding offset through OMPF. Historically, this has not been the case. 

    AMO again urges the Government to reconsider the order of these reviews, and in the meantime, restore $25 million to the OMPF envelope in 2014. These changes are occurring while the 2013 OMPF is in transition. Allocations have not been calculated using up-to-date figures, such as property assessment rates, policing and social assistance costs, which adds to the challenges that municipalities will face in 2014.

    Source Water Protection
    The Budget includes $13.5 million over three years for drinking water source protection.  This will assist small and rural communities. Additional details are pending.

    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Brian Lambie
    AMO Media Contact
    lambie@redbrick.ca
    T 416.729.5425

    Links

    Interest Arbitration Recommendations
    Ontario Budget Delivers Infrastructure Investment; Silent on Tools to Manage Costs
    Toronto, Ontario, May 2, 2013 – The Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) welcomes the Ontario Budget’s proposed investments in infrastructure, such as roads, bridges and public transit.
    02/05/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    The Province is in a better position to invest in communities because it has controlled costs, including growth in wages and benefits. Municipalities need better tools to do the same.

    “All governments – federal, provincial and municipal – need to work together to make infrastructure investments that promote safety and economic prosperity,” said AMO President Russ Powers. “The municipal property tax base cannot support the level of investment that’s needed and the demand exists right across Ontario. The Budget is on the right track by investing in urban, rural and northern communities.”

    Specifically, the Budget would invest $100 million in 2013-14 for roads and bridges in northern and rural areas, and make the existing provincial gas tax transfer permanent. Currently, two cents in gas tax revenue is transferred to municipalities for every litre that’s sold. The Budget also makes mention of supporting transportation and transit infrastructure in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, but it does not provide details.

    The Budget emphasizes the Ontario Government’s success in controlling costs, particularly with respect to wages and benefits. It notes that the Province has been more successful than municipal governments. For some time, municipalities have been calling on the Province to provide the tools that they need to achieve similar results. Changes to Ontario’s interest arbitration system are the most obvious and pressing.

    “The Ontario Government says it is confident that broader public sector partners can work together to control wage and benefit costs while protecting services. Municipalities are not. Current economic conditions have not prevented interest arbitrators from awarding extremely high wage and benefit increases for emergency service employees. These increases will continue without changes to Provincial legislation – and four attempts to balance the system have failed in the past 12 months.”

    More detailed Budget analysis will be provided by AMO through its free Breaking News Alerts and weekly e-newsletter, the Watch File.

    AMO is a non-profit organization representing almost all of Ontario’s 444 municipal governments. AMO supports and enhances strong and effective municipal government in Ontario and promotes the value of municipal government as a vital and essential component of Ontario and Canada’s political system.

    - 30 -
    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Brian Lambie
    AMO Media Contact
    lambie@redbrick.ca
    T 416.729.5425

    Backgrounder

    2013 Ontario Budget

    2013 Provincial Budget Released
    The Honourable Charles Sousa, Minister of Finance has released the 2013 provincial budget and includes a number of highlights which affect municipalities:
    02/05/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    • The budget continues to honour the existing upload agreement.  In 2014, the upload benefit value to municipalities totals almost $1.4 billion.  This reconfirms earlier commitments to continue the uploading schedule as agreed to in 2008.

    • The Minister’s speech acknowledges the need to, “prevent further pressure on our property taxes” to fund infrastructure investments.  This message is reinforced on four key points:
      • As announced last week, the government will create a $100 million infrastructure fund for roads, bridges and other critical infrastructure to help small, rural and northern municipalities. The government will consult with municipalities on an allocation methodology soon.  These funds will be available as of October 2013;
      • Consultations will start on the development of a permanent infrastructure funding program for rural and northern municipalities in 2014;
      • Existing provincial government support for public transit systems across the province will be made permanent and enshrined in the budget bill. Currently 2 cents per litre of the provincial gas tax provides over 90 municipalities with about $321 million annually. This permanency offers municipalities a predictable and stable source of revenue that grows with the economy. It meets a key ask of the municipal sector; and
      • The government will consider new revenue tools to support transportation and public transit in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area.

    • Regarding the property assessment system, the government has announced a review of some key elements. This review will be led by the Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Finance, Steven Del Duca, MPP and consultations will be completed by the fall.  It will review assessment appeal timelines and assessment methodologies applied to the evaluation of special-purpose business properties such as mills, industrial lands, landfills, and billboards.  It will also consider how to strengthen the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) and its governance. This review will not be looking at issues affecting residential property assessment.

    • The budget reaffirms a decrease to the Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) by $25 million in 2014. The Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) remains extremely concerned with this decrease.  It is occurring at the same time as the government is consulting separately on the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) costing formula and key property assessment issues during the OMPF transitional year.  These are two very significant municipal cost and revenue issues currently in flux which the OMPF is supposed to help address.  The sequencing of these three reviews could cause unintended consequences for municipalities in 2014.  AMO again urges the government to reconsider the order of these reviews and in the meantime, restore $25 million to the OMPF envelope in 2014.

    • The budget contains changes to the social assistance system which will have municipal cost implications starting in 2014.  These include costs related to raising the earnings exemption and the rate increase for Ontario Works (OW).  Government officials could not provide a figure on how much these changes, among others, will affect municipalities.  AMO awaits these numbers.  In 2014, municipalities remain responsible for funding 14.2% of OW benefit costs.  This reinforces the need for caution when considering the OMPF for qualifying municipalities.

    • Also included is $13.5 million over three years for drinking water source protection. This will assist small and rural communities. Additional details are pending.

    AMO will continue its review of the budget and keep the membership informed.
    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Matthew Wilson
    Senior Advisor
    mwilson@amo.on.ca
    T 416.971.9856 ext. 323
    TF 1.877.426.6527
    F 416.971.6191

    Links

    2013 Ontario Budget
    AMO Budget News Release
    Member Breaking News: 2010 OMPF Reconciliation Announced Amid Future Funding Uncertainty
    Today the Ministry of Finance released the final reconciliation of the 2010 Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF).
    12/04/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    This means 180 municipalities from across the province will receive payments totaling nearly $28 million.  It was also re-announced that this is the last year in which the Ministry will provide OMPF reconciliation payments.

    Since the inception of the OMPF the government has provided reconciliation funding which responds to actual municipal costs for social services and policing versus estimates. This responsiveness has been a key feature of the Fund.  The OMPF is a critical provincial funding program that assists municipalities with social program costs, equalization, policing costs, and assists northern and rural communities to provide services to citizens.
      
    AMO is very disappointed with the government’s plan to discontinue reconciliation payments for 2011 and beyond.  Since the termination of these payments was first announced in November 2012, AMO has pressed the issue with successive Ministers of Finance and Municipal Affairs and Housing.

    A great deal of uncertainty surrounds future OMPF allocations and the operating budget support it provides to qualifying municipalities.  Four issues are at play:
    1. The end of reconciliation means that from fiscal year 2011 onwards any variances in municipal costs for social assistance or policing will not be offset by the OMPF.  It means that under the OMPF formula of 2011 and 2012, that the government will not pay bills for actual program costs.  Municipalities will have to absorb these expenses.
    2. OMPF allocations in 2013 (under the new OMPF 'transition' formula) have been determined as a percentage of 2012 OMPF allocations exacerbating the Fund’s non-responsiveness to changing municipal costs.
    3. A further $25 million cut to the OMPF is scheduled for 2014 which will be an added negative impact for municipalities. The OMPF exists to help those municipalities which don't have the assessment base or household incomes to pay higher property taxes.
    4. Expected increases to 2014 OPP policing costs due to the implementation of the 4th year of the OPP collective agreement and what might happen to OPP billing in the future.
    As a result, AMO’s pre-budget submission called on the government to restore reconciliation for 2011 and 2012.  It also seeks a deferral of the $25 million OMPF cut schedule for 2014.  Finally, AMO has been advocating for decreases in policing costs through our participation in the Future of Policing Advisory Committee (FPAC) and other policing forums, including the OPP billing working group.  Discussion with the government on all these points continues.

    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Matthew Wilson
    Senior Advisor
    mwilson@amo.on.ca
    T 416.971.9856 ext. 323
    TF 1.877.426.6527
    F 416.971.6191

    Links

    Ministry of Finance 2010 OMPF Reconciliation Release
    AMO's 2013 Pre-Budget Submission: The Next Chapter
    On March 22, 2013 AMO President, Russ Powers, presented AMO’s 2013 Pre-Budget Submission to the Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs. Below are highlights for the interest of members.
    25/03/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    Submission Highlights:
    1. The Upload:  Municipalities continue to applaud the upload Agreement.  We need to see its continued protection, without any slippage and we thank the Premier for her commitment to it.

    2. No new mandates:  Significant costs of other social programs remain on the property tax base.  While officials at the province may point to the upload ‘savings’, municipal governments respond to the operational challenges of providing social housing, child care, source water protection plans, making accessibility standards a reality and helping to fund hospital capital.  A long list of ‘ancillary’ policies and programs hits our bottom line and eats up these ‘savings’.  We ask for no new mandates or unfunded responsibilities.

    3. The Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund:  Narrowing the gap between the relatively fiscally healthier and poorer communities must remain a constant and unambiguous aim.  Is 2014 really the best time to make another $25 million cut to the OMPF?  Does it make sense to cut funding for equalization, northern/rural communities and policing even further?  It is this group of municipalities that bore a $25 million reduction this year and will face a further $50 million cut over next two years.  This seems counter intuitive and even more so when those rural and northern municipalities with OPP must pay an 8.55% wage increase for 2014.  In addition, we call on the government to restore OMPF reconciliation for 2011 and 2012.

    4. Infrastructure Financing:  A successful solution to the infrastructure financing challenge will meet the unique needs of each region while recognizing their differing fiscal capacities.  Rural and northern municipalities need a dedicated fund for roads and bridges.  For urban Ontario, where the tax base is broader and the economy is stronger, the range of financing tools being considered would go a long way towards meeting urban transportation needs.

    5. Development Charges:  Even modest changes to the Development Charges Act to permit development charges for hospital capital and transit would be a good place to start fixing the funding challenge in urban areas.

    6. Interest Arbitration:  All municipalities – large and small across Ontario are committed to changes to interest arbitration.  What we are interested in is a system that is fair, has balance for both employers and employees and holds arbitrators to account for their decisions.  Interest arbitration decisions do materially affect the fiscal situation of municipal governments and their taxpayers.

    7. Policing Costs:  It is time to rethink how we deliver policing.  What alternatives exist regarding core and non-core policing functions?  Are there cheaper alternatives to delivering court security? Could community safety education, crime prevention and assisting the victims of crime be more efficiently delivered?  What efficiencies can be found in the operations of the Ontario Provincial Police?  AMO remains committed to working with the government and others on these issues, however, we cannot afford to wait long for solutions.

    President Powers also wrote to the Minister of Finance to highlight the importance of other key issues.  He noted last week’s introduction of new legislative tools to improve the collection of Provincial Offences Act fines as an excellent example of provincial-municipal problem solving.  Some of the other ideas we’ve offered include:
    1. More efficient public services:  Greater efficiencies are possible with the recommendations of the recent social assistance review and how these services are delivered.  AMO is committed to exploring these options provided any changes do not add new burdens to the property tax dollar.  Similarly with Dr. Samir Sinha’s report on proposals to better serve the needs of our senior population; AMO is keen to explore delivering better services in better ways, but not on the back of the property tax dollar.

    2. Infrastructure Financing:  Since 2005, AMO has administered Canada’s Gas Tax Fund for every municipality in the province except Toronto.  It is the best tool for long-term funding because it is predictable.  It permits municipalities to be responsive to local needs, without grant applications, review and approval.  It trusts municipalities to use the funds for its capital needs and sets out a transparent, accountable and cost efficient on-line administration that meet all of its audit requirements and program objectives.  It is a measure of how all infrastructure programs, both federal and provincial can be delivered.

    3. Simplifying Reporting Requirements:  One of the matters that the Drummond Report highlighted was the amount of provincial oversight and municipal reporting that is required but not usefully analysed.  One municipality tallied the reports it provides to the province on a yearly basis.  It submits the following to provincial ministries:  96 monthly reports, 100 quarterly reports, 6 semi-annual reports and 68 annual reports.  This is a total of 270 reports annually plus an additional 16 audited statements, plus the annual Financial Information Return.  From AMO’s perspective, there is plenty of room to simplify reporting requirements while maintaining accountability and better coordination of these activities in straightforward ways.  The regulatory and reporting pendulum must return to the middle.  We are calling for the province and municipalities to figure out a better way.

    4. Joint and Several Liability:  Liability reform remains an ongoing need.  Joint and several liabilities translate into a punishing financial burden for many municipalities with fractional responsibility for an individual’s loss.  Nothing will focus attention on the issue more quickly than when insurance companies cease offering municipal coverage.  We need to avoid this worst case scenario.  The complexity of this issue is no reason to shy away from finding a better solution as many other jurisdictions have already done.

    5. Provincial Land Tax:  The property tax inequities that exist in the north where municipalities border unincorporated areas with low taxes and minimal services needs to be addressed.

    6. Heads and Beds and Dam Payments:  Municipalities which host post-secondary institutions are increasingly disadvantaged by a payment-in-lieu regime that has remained unchanged in over twenty years.  This includes provincial facilities such as universities, colleges, correctional institutions, hospitals and facilities for the disabled.  Adding to that, for the next three years the province is freezing payments to municipalities which host hydro-electric facilities.  These costs are on the backs of municipal property taxpayers in these communities.  The province needs to pay its own bills.

    7. The direct appointment of municipal representatives to the MPAC Board:  Here’s an easy opportunity to streamline a process and recognise municipalities as a mature order of government. Currently AMO submits a list of names to the Minister of Finance from which the Minister chooses municipal representatives to the MPAC Board.  Having municipalities choose their representative directly would simplify the process considerably.
    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Matthew Wilson
    Senior Advisor
    mwilson@amo.on.ca
    T 416.971.9856 ext. 323
    TF 1.877.426.6527
    F 416.971.6191

    2013 Pre-Budget Submission


    (Adobe PDF File)
    The Next Chapter
    E-mail this page to a friend

    Advocacy

    Economic Development Energy Finance Housing Infrastructure Labour Planning Risk Management Social Services Waste Management
     

    Events & Training

    Conferences Councillor Training Symposiums Webcasts Workshops

    About Us

    Accessibility AMOmobile app Annual Report Awards Board of Directors By-Law Careers Contact Us History Membership Memorandum of Understanding Municipal 101 Products & Services Volunteering Watch File
    Related Sites
    FONOM Gas Tax at Work LAS MEPCO NOMA OMKN OSUM ROMA
     
    Programs
    Gas Tax MIDAS

    Working to make Ontario municipalities stronger
    © 2013 Association of Municipalities of Ontario   |   website policy


    {1}
    ##LOC[OK]##
    {1}
    ##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##
    {1}
    ##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##