• Text Size
  • Contrast
  • |    Contact Us    |
  • Login  
  • About Us
  • Events & Training
  • Advocacy
About Us Accessibility Annual Report Awards
By-Law Board of Directors Contact Us Careers
History Membership Municipal 101 Memorandum of Understanding
Products & Services Volunteering Watch File
Events
Event Registration

MIDAS
Dashboard
Contact Us
Checkout

labour
Result of 1-5 of 45
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • >>
    reset search      

    MEPCO Update on OMERS, April 25, 2013
    The 2013 cycle for considering Specified Plan Change (SPC) Proposals is in process, with proposals being formally tabled by sponsor representatives to the Sponsors Corporation (SC) Board.
    25/04/2013
    test
    • New Tab

    MEPCO Update on OMERS:  April 25, 2013 

    The SC Board is required to make decisions by the end of June.   Employer representatives are continuing efforts to reduce plan benefits on either a temporary or go forward basis, in order to deal with high contribution rates.  

    As at April 23, five SPC proposals have been submitted from both employer and employee sponsors. Highlights:

    Proposal #01-13 NRA 60 Police Civilians (PAO)
    Proposal would make NRA 60 benefits available to members of the Primary Plan who are police civilians and whose employers change to NRA 60 in respect of this class of members, effective January 1, 2014.

    Proposal #02-13 Reduce Indexing to 50% (AMO, Toronto, OAPSB)
    Proposal has 3 elements:
    i) When the Primary Plan is in deficit, the current automatic 100% indexing would be reduced to up to 50% of the CPI increases in the previous year, meaning that only 50% of the CPI increase would be pre-funded.  
    ii) Where retirees whose pension may be less in any year as a result of (i), the SC would determine if pensions of retirees should be increased for that year, after receiving the Primary Plan valuation for the previous year.  In making its determination the Corporation will consider the current state of the Fund, the likelihood of further contribution increases being required in the next 5 years, the amount of CPI increase in the previous year and such other factors as the Corporation shall take into account in making its decision.  
    iii) Upon the next filing of the Primary plan valuation, contributions would be reduced to the minimum level permitted by law.
    This proposal would be effective January 1, 2015 or as soon as notice of change can be given, but not later than January 1, 2016. 

    Proposal #03-13 Delay Early Retirement (AMO, Toronto)
    Current members in respect of service after December 31, 2015 and employees becoming members of OMERS after this date would not be able to exercise an unreduced early retirement option before age 55 for NRA 60 members and age 60 for NRA 65 members, effective January 1, 2016.

    Proposal #04-13 Benefit Accrual Rate 1.85% (AMO, EDA) 
    (i) Beginning January 1, 2015, a reduced multiplier of 1.85% in the pension formula for earnings above the YMPE (Year’s Maximum Pensionable Earnings for CPP set by CRA) would be applied.
    (ii) Allow the maximum years of service accrual to increase to permit members to continue to achieve a pension with a 70% replacement ratio. 

    Proposal #05-13 NRA 60 Paramedics (OPSEU,CUPE)               
    This proposal would amend the Primary plan to allow employers to provide NRA 60 benefits to paramedics, effective January 1, 2014.

    Summary:
    Proposals 2, 3 and 4 would contribute to the sustainability of the Plan and help reduce the current pressures on the Plan.  Proposals 1 and 5 would shift certain employees to NRA 60 which has a higher allocation of contribution rate given the cost of the NRA 60 benefits and would impact municipal budgets where municipalities have their own police services and provide ambulance services. 
    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    Links

    2013 SPC Proposals and Rationale
    Member Breaking News: Interest Arbitration - Private Members’ Bill Tabled
    Today Jim Wilson, MPP tabled a Private Members’ Bill concerning interest arbitration titled the Public Sector Capacity to Pay Act, 2013.
    28/03/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    This represents the fourth piece of attempted legislation by various parties during the last 12 months. This Bill’s Second Reading debate is scheduled for April 11, 2013.

    The Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) believes this Bill holds significant improvement to all the previous legislative attempts. It reflects the balance and many of the practical changes that we’ve put forward to members of the Legislature. AMO’s proposals are not designed to provide a guaranteed outcome. We have proposed tools for arbitrators to use when measuring fiscal health and we are stating the perfectly reasonable expectation that they should demonstrate in writing how they came to their decisions, whatever they are. How can transparency and accountability be criticized? Taxpayers deserve accountable and transparent decisions when tax dollars are being spent. This is true for arbitrators who decide what the pay and benefit awards will be for emergency services workers where matters cannot be resolved locally.

    Over the years, arbitration awards that replicate decisions with a ‘one size fits all approach’ have not been reflective of, nor grounded within, the local economic realities of Ontario’s varied communities. Worse, they have outpaced negotiated, local agreements with other unionized employees, generally, and within individual municipalities. Arbitrated settlements should be comparable to the outcomes that result from free collective bargaining for employee groups that can strike, particularly at a time when public sector unions recognize local economic challenges and reach freely negotiated settlements.

    AMO is encouraged by this Bill.  For it to proceed, it will need the cooperation of the government and opposition parties.  AMO is calling on our provincial legislators to roll up their sleeves and move this Bill forward.  AMO remains committed to facilitating these conversations. Municipal leaders support interest arbitration changes that put balance into a system that is out of balance and one that is not accountable or transparent.

    Attached is AMO’s chart which compares our proposal to this Bill and the draft government bill of last October. The latter was released for discussion before the House was prorogued and Premier Wynne’s government began. In February, we presented to all MPPs our checklist of what changes should be made to the interest arbitration process to the Legislature.

    Two areas that are problematic in this Private Members’ Bill relate to the timeline for decisions and a more elaborate appointment process for arbitrators. In keeping with our recommendations, the Bill provides for a single arbitrator for all interest arbitration hearings, rather than a three member panel for fire.  A single arbitrator approach has proven to be efficient and fair.

    The Bill’s proposed changes to pre and post hearing procedures reflect our input.  The Bill requires written reasons for an award and a clear explanation of how a community’s fiscal health was considered, using meaningful criteria.  The criteria reflect those we developed in partnership with the Ontario Municipal Finance Officers’ Association.  Arbitrators will still have the ability to look at comparable communities, but they cannot ignore local circumstances.

    We frequently hear that emergency service workers should be paid at a higher scale than other municipal workers because of their responsibilities and risks.  This is already recognized in salary grids and this will continue.  Collective bargaining will continue and when necessary, interest arbitration will be used.

    AMO calls on municipal leaders across the province to raise the importance of these particular changes with their MPPs and constituents and to demand that the Legislature come together to work on this important legislation – to bring fair and balanced improvements that are in Ontario’s best interests.

    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Matthew Wilson
    Senior Advisor
    mwilson@amo.on.ca
    T 416.971.9856 ext. 323
    TF 1.877.426.6527
    F 416.971.6191

    Backgrounders

    AMO’s Checklist of needed changes
    AMO’s Call for MPP Action
    AMO’s News Release “Public Sector Capacity to Pay Act, 2013”
    AMO’s Comparison of Proposed Legislation Against its Ask
    Arbitration: The Fiscal Impact
    Arbitration: Municipal Experiences  

    Links

    ESSC Ability to Pay Position Paper
    Government’s Draft Compensation Legislation
    AMO's News Release February 14, 2013

    Related Links

    City of Toronto supports Call for Improvements to Interest Arbitration System

    AMO Welcomes Signal for Fair and Transparent Interest Arbitration
    Toronto, Ontario, February 19, 2013 – AMO looks forward to working with the government on how to move the sentiments of the Throne Speech into good public policy.
    19/02/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    The 2013 Speech from the Throne noted that the government “will sit down with its partners across all sectors to build a sustainable model for wage negotiation, respectful of both collective bargaining and a fair and transparent interest arbitration process, so that the brightness of our shared future is not clouded by the indisputable economic realities of our time.”

    Last week, AMO joined by municipal leaders from the Large Urban Mayors’ Caucus of Ontario and the Mayors and Regional Chairs of Ontario, shared a legislative checklist aimed at addressing key issues with the province’s interest arbitration system. These changes are focused on bringing transparency and accountability to the interest arbitration process for municipal essential service union awards.

    Interest arbitration is the only legal way to settle contract negotiation disputes with essential workers, such as police and firefighters, who are not allowed to strike. Municipal governments have been frustrated with the lack of transparency around decisions and the priority that replication of agreements from one community to another has over consideration of local fiscal conditions.  In addition, the length of the process can be long, sometimes taking years before a decision is made.

    AMO’s legislative check list includes:
    • Streamlining the process and creating a 12-month timeline for an award decision.
    • Requiring that arbitrators give priority to how the fiscal health of a community was considered and provide clear, written explanation of this.
    • Clear, measurable criteria for evaluating the fiscal health of a community.

    “We are encouraged by the Premier’s call for a fair and transparent process,” said AMO President Russ Powers. “As lawmakers reconvene, municipal leaders from across the province are calling on all three parties to work together and make sure they make these meaningful improvements to the interest arbitration system.”

    AMO is a non-profit organization representing almost all of Ontario’s 444 municipal governments.  AMO supports and enhances strong and effective municipal government in Ontario and promotes the value of municipal government as a vital and essential component of Ontario and Canada’s political system.

    - 30 -

    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Brian Lambie
    AMO Media Contact
    lambie@redbrick.ca
    T 416.729.5425

    Backgrounders

    Arbitration Checklist
    Arbitration:  The Fiscal Impact
    Arbitration: Municipal Experiences  

    Links

    AMO News Release February 14, 2013 
    ESSC Ability to Pay Position Paper
    Government’s Draft Compensation Legislation

    Related Links

    City of Toronto supports Call for Improvements to Interest Arbitration System

    Interest Arbitration Checklist
    Produced with the assistance of the Emergency Services Steering Committee.
    14/02/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    AMO’s list of specific changes to the arbitration system that will improve efficiency, accountability and transparency, and better define a municipality’s capacity to pay.
    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Brian Lambie
    AMO Media Contact
    lambie@redbrick.ca
    T 416.729.5425

    Download


    (Adobe PDF File)
    Interest Arbitration Checklist
    Interest Arbitration Should Be Efficient, Transparent and Accountable
    Toronto, Ontario, February 14, 2013 – Municipal leaders are calling on all three political parties to work together to make meaningful improvements to Ontario’s interest arbitration system.
    14/02/2013
    test
    • New Tab
    Municipal Leaders’ Checklist Aims for More Efficient, Accountable and Transparent Interest Arbitration.

    At a news briefing today, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, joined by the Large Urban Mayors’ Caucus of Ontario (LUMCO) and the Mayors and Regional Chairs of Ontario (MARCO), shared a legislative checklist aimed at addressing key issues. 

    “There were several legislative proposals tabled last year to make changes to the interest arbitration system,” said AMO President Russ Powers. “As lawmakers reconvene, this checklist is an effort to make sure they get it right.  Taxpayers should see how decisions are arrived at and what it means for their community.”
    Interest arbitration is the only legal way to settle contract negotiation disputes with essential workers, such as police and firefighters, who are not allowed to strike.

    Municipal governments are frustrated with the priority that replication of agreements from one community to another has over consideration of local fiscal conditions.  In addition, the length of the process can be long, sometimes taking years before a decision is made.  
    AMO’s legislative check list includes:
    • Streamlining the process and creating a 12-month timeline for completion.
    • Clear, measurable criteria for evaluating the fiscal health of a community.
    • Requiring that arbitrators give priority to and provide clear, written explanation of how the fiscal health of a community was considered.
    “We value emergency service personnel.  Their professional training and responsibilities are recognized within a municipal government’s overall pay structure,” said LUMCO Chair and Mississauga Mayor Hazel McCallion. “It is reasonable that annual pay raises reflect the economic circumstances of the community they serve, and to be comparable to increases given to its other municipal employees.” 

    “The changes do not direct an outcome for either party at interest arbitration,” noted Niagara Regional Chair Gary Burroughs.  “Instead, these changes mean community taxpayers know how their tax contributions pay for the award and how the decision was made.”

    AMO is a non-profit organization representing almost all of Ontario’s 444 municipal governments.  AMO supports and enhances strong and effective municipal government in Ontario and promotes the value of municipal government as a vital and essential component of Ontario and Canada’s political system.

    - 30 -
    Send Email To Friend

    Send To (email):
    Your Name:
    Subject:
    Your Message:
    (optional)
    Send Email
    Sending email..


    select
    • Options
    • Design
    GUEST

    Contact

    Brian Lambie
    AMO Media Contact
    lambie@redbrick.ca
    T 416.729.5425

    Backgrounders

    AMO's Call for MPP Action
    AMO's Comparison of Proposed Legislation
    Arbitration Checklist
    Arbitration: The Fiscal Impact
    Arbitration: Municipal Experiences  

    Links

    ESSC Ability to Pay Position Paper
    Government’s Draft Compensation Legislation

    Related Links

    City of Toronto supports Call for Improvements to Interest Arbitration System



    E-mail this page to a friend

    Advocacy

    Economic Development Energy Finance Housing Infrastructure Labour Planning Risk Management Social Services Waste Management
     

    Events & Training

    Conferences Councillor Training Symposiums Webcasts Workshops

    About Us

    Accessibility AMOmobile app Annual Report Awards Board of Directors By-Law Careers Contact Us History Membership Memorandum of Understanding Municipal 101 Products & Services Volunteering Watch File
    Related Sites
    FONOM Gas Tax at Work LAS MEPCO NOMA OMKN OSUM ROMA
     
    Programs
    Gas Tax MIDAS

    Working to make Ontario municipalities stronger
    © 2013 Association of Municipalities of Ontario   |   website policy


    {1}
    ##LOC[OK]##
    {1}
    ##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##
    {1}
    ##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##